HomeServicesCompanyInsightsCareersContactE-Banking
SEC rejection of the last outstanding BTC ETF proposal: an appraisalStablecoins and CBDCs dominated regulatory pronouncements during February 2020Other noteworthy developmentsConclusion
Thursday, 12 March, 2020
The Digital Regulator

USA once again rejects an ETF on bitcoin

Abstract

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has rejected the last outstanding Bitcoin (BTC) ETF proposal. It was the ninth rejection in a row. The decision taken by the SEC attests to the controversial decision-making process within the SEC, which contrasts with the pragmatic, inclusive and innovation-friendly approach taken by other jurisdictions such as Switzerland. Furthermore, it stifles financial innovation and delays the adoption of cryptocurrencies in the country, promoting an unregulated perimeter. The approval of the first BTC ETF emerged as a watershed moment for cryptofinance adoption in the USA.

Regulators around the globe multiplied their pronouncements and initiatives in the area of stablecoins during February 2020. Stablecoins are seen as a promising way to enhance the cross-border payment system and remedy related inefficiencies. However, the pronouncements also indicate that the approval of any stablecoins will be subject to strict evaluation and approval criteria, including KYC and AML aspects.

SEC rejection of the last outstanding BTC ETF proposal: an appraisal

The rejectionrejectionlink1 of Wilshire-Phoenix’s BTC ETF proposalby the SEC on 26 February 2020 was the ninth denial of such proposals in a row. It came after multiple postponements and was followed by official dissentdissentlink1 by SEC Commissioner H. Peirce1.

The decision taken by the SEC stifles financial innovation, delays the adoption of cryptocurrencies and promotes an unregulated perimeter in the USA. It attests to the controversial decision-making process within the SEC, which contrasts with the pragmatic, inclusive and innovation-friendly approach taken by other jurisdictions such as Switzerland (where the world’s first listed cryptocurrencies exchange traded product (ETP) was introduced in 2018).

  • Hopes betrayed: The SEC has rejected all BTC ETFs proposed so far. Rejection decisions are normally taken within the announced deadline. About a year ago, however, the agency began postponing its decisions to allow more time to consider the proposed rule change. These events led the industry to hope that an approval would be near. Individual statements by officials lent support to such hopes.

    The first postponement was announced in March 2019 and concerned the BTC ETF proposed by VanEck and SolidX. In May 2019 the agency shifted the deadline for reviewing the Bitwise proposal to an undisclosed date, while during the summer, SEC officials such as commissioner H. Peirce went on record in support of the approval. In August 2019, the SEC once again postponed the decision on three pending BTC ETF proposals: to 29 September for Wilshire Phoenix, 13 October for Bitwise and 18 October for VanEck/SolidX. The SEC opened up wider consultation to support the final decision. The delays led to the voluntary withdrawal of the BTC ETF proposed by VanEck and SolidX (the proponents decided to offer the vehicle to institutional investors by leveraging a SEC exemption rule). A further decision to delay the Bitwise proposal led Bitwise Asset Management to withdraw the application on 14 January 2020. Wilshire Phoenix updated their filing in October 2019, but eventually the SEC rejected the proposal on 26 February 2020.

  • Insufficient compliance: The SEC has rejected all proposals on the basis that none of them guarantees compliance with Section 6(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The provision was designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative market acts and practices. The SEC proxied the BTC ETF proposals with commodities ETPs. In the latter space, each exchange listing the ETP has entered a surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market that trades the underlying commodity.

    The SEC concluded that only BTC ETF proposals that demonstrate a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated and sizeable market trading the underlying assets would be deemed compliant with the provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC deemed as insufficient the arguments produced by the proponents of BTC ETFs which aimed to demonstrate that other means besides surveillance-sharing agreements would effectively prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. The SEC has systematically asserted that the proposed BTC ETFs have not established that the relevant BTC market is resistant to manipulations beyond that of traditional security or commodity markets. Furthermore, it has reiterated the belief that the BTC market is prone to fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices that could unduly hurt retail investors.

  • Internal dissent: The SEC is currently governed by four commissioners, including the Chairman. Following the rejection of the last pending BTC ETF proposal, SEC Commissioner H. Peirce publicly dissented to the SEC decision. Her key arguments were:

    • The Securities Exchange Act provision requires the SEC to look at the rules of the exchange seeking to list the product. It does not require the SEC to look at the attributes of the assets or markets underlying the product to be traded. Yet, the Commission did not look at the rules of the listing exchange, but only at the BTC market.
    • The Commission is holding the BTC market to standards never applied to commodities markets before, for example the requirement for the BTC market to have in place surveillance-sharing agreements with the exchange listing the ETF. Commissioner H. Peirce concludes that these further refinements of the standard expressed in the Commission’s demands appear to be designed for the sole purpose of keeping BTC out of the markets.

The SEC has denied all BTC ETF proposals so far. The internal decision-making process has witnessed increasing disagreement within the agency, culminating over time in multiple delays, additional consultations and public dissent by one of the three Commissioners. The systematic increase in the qualifying requirements have created standards for approval of BTC ETF proposals that are higher than for ETP proposals in any other alternative asset class (e.g. commodities). Against the backdrop of the steady adoption of cryptocurrencies, the absence of an approved BTC ETF vehicle is obliging US investors to seek access to such products outside the safety net that securities laws would provide. Such access is likely to be found outside the US jurisdiction, fuelling financial innovation outside the country. On balance, the history of BTC ETF rejections in the USA contrasts with the more inclusive, innovation-friendly and pragmatic approach followed by a jurisdiction such as Switzerland (home of the world’s first listed cryptocurrencies ETP).

Stablecoins and CBDCs dominated regulatory pronouncements during February 2020

Global regulators renew their focus on stablecoins and recognise the need to enhance the cross-border payment system

  • The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has announcedannouncedlink1 a consultative report on stablecoins (public consultation to start in April). The report will set out an evaluation process and approval criteria for stablecoin projects. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has set as a strategic priority for 2020 the mitigation of money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF) risks of virtual assets and will report to the G20 in July 2020 on its analysis regarding stablecoins. Both global standard setters recognise the need to enhance global cross-border payment arrangements and facilitate swifter transfers at a lower cost.

Pronouncements by regulators about Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) continue and suggest CBDC will remain a key topic during 2020

  • The Bank of EnglandBank of Englandlink1 has urged central banks to research digital currencies, fearing that private companies could be swifter and dominate the space.

  • The former governor of the Banque de FranceBanque de Francelink1, Jean-Claude Trichet, expects wholesale payments to happen fairly soon. CBDCs that are directly available to consumers, however, will not emerge soon.

  • Sweden’s central bankSweden’s central banklink1 has announced the launch of a pilot project of its proposed e-krona. The project will use blockchain technology.

  • LithuaniaLithuanialink1 has openly supported CBDCs, highlighting inclusion aspects and reduced costs. The authorities have emphasised the need to ensure adequate consumer protection.

  • CambodiaCambodialink1 has announced the issuance of a government-backed cryptocurrency on an open blockchain-based payment and money transfer platform. The aim is to make it easier for end-users to pay each other regardless of the institutions they bank with.

Other noteworthy developments

SEC Commissioner H. Peirce proposes ways to enhance the legal security of digital assets

  • The Commissioner has proposedproposedlink1 the introduction of a ‘sandbox period’ for newly issued digital assets. This would ensure that during this period, the assets would not be treated legally as securities. The purpose of the new rule would be to promote innovation in a legally secure context.

The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has addressed secondary trading venues for crypto-assets

  • The reportreportlink1 assists IOSCO members in evaluating the issues and risks relating to secondary crypto-asset trading platforms. It focuses on platforms which the regulatory authority has determined to have legal authority to regulate the assets and related activities.

Conclusion

The month of February 2020 was marked by the US SEC rejection of the last outstanding BTC ETF proposal. The event vividly illustrates the different approach followed by the US jurisdiction towards cryptofinance innovations, compared for instance to jurisdictions such as Switzerland. It also points to growing tensions in the decision-making process within the SEC. In the end, the approval of the first BTC ETF proposal has emerged as the watershed event for the development of cryptofinance in the USA.


1Also known as "Crypto Mom".
Download pdf
Share:
Subscribe to the research newsletter and get weekly updates about the latest articles of SEBAresearch
Subscribe to newsletter

Authors


Mattia Rattaggi
External Regulatory Analyst
METI Advisory AG
in
Yves Longchamp
Head of Research
SEBA Bank AG
in
research@seba.swiss | Disclaimer

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is published solely for information purposes; it is not an advertisement nor is it a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning SEBA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the financial investments, markets or developments referred to in the document. SEBA does not undertake to update or keep current the information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent SEBA's interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any prices stated in this document are for information purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been effected at those prices, and any prices do not necessarily reflect SEBA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by SEBA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications. SEBA and any of its directors or employees may be entitled at any time to hold long or short positions in investments, carry out transactions involving relevant investments in the capacity of principal or agent, or provide any other services or have officers, who serve as directors, either to/for the issuer, the investment itself or to/for any company commercially or financially affiliated to such investment.

At any time, investment decisions (including whether to buy, sell or hold investments) made by SEBA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in SEBA research publications.

Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. Investing in digital assets including cryptocurrencies as well as in futures and options is not suitable for every investor as there is a substantial risk of loss, and losses in excess of an initial investment may under certain circumstances occur. The value of any investment or income may go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Additional information will be made available upon request. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.

SEBA does not provide legal or tax advice and makes no representations as to the tax treatment of assets or the investment returns thereon both in general or with reference to specific investor’s circumstances and needs. We are of necessity unable to take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of individual investors and we would recommend that you take financial and/or tax advice as to the implications (including tax) prior to investing. Neither SEBA nor any of its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss (including investment loss) or damage arising out of the use of all or any of the Information provided in the document.

This document may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of SEBA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing SEBA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. SEBA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of SEBA. The information contained in this document is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. SEBA may use research input provided by analysts employed by its affiliate B&B Analytics Private Limited, Mumbai. The analyst(s) responsible for the preparation of this document may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other parties for the purpose of gathering, applying and interpreting market information The compensation of the analyst who prepared this document is determined exclusively by SEBA.

Austria: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Austria nor is SEBA supervised by the Austrian Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. France: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in France nor is SEBA supervised by French banking and financial authorities. Italy: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Italy nor is SEBA supervised by the Bank of Italy (Banca d’Italia) and the Italian Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (CONSOB - Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Germany: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Germany nor is SEBA supervised by the German Federal Financial Services Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Hong-Kong: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Hong-Kong nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Hong-Kong, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Hong-Kong where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder (the “SFO”). Netherlands: This publication has been produced by SEBA, which is not authorised to provide regulated services in the Netherlands. Portugal: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Portugal nor is SEBA supervised by the Portuguese regulators Bank of Portugal “Banco de Portugal” and Portuguese Securities Exchange Commission “Comissao do Mercado de Valores Mobiliarios”. Singapore: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in SIngapore nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Singapore, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document was provided to you as a result of a request received by SEBA from you and/or persons entitled to make the request on your behalf. Should you have received the document erroneously, SEBA asks that you kindly destroy/delete it and inform SEBA immediately. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Singapore where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not accredited investors, expert investors or institutional investors as defined in section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289 of Singapore) (“SFA”). UK: This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.

SEBA is not an authorised person for purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), and accordingly, any information if deemed a financial promotion is provided only to persons in the UK reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom promotions may be communicated by an unauthorised person pursuant to an exemption under the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments (“Investment Professionals”) and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO (“High Net Worth Businesses”). High Net Worth Businesses include: (i) a corporation which has called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million or is a member of a group in which includes a company with called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million (but where the corporation has more than 20 shareholders or it is a subsidiary of a company with more than 20 shareholders, the £5 million share capital / net assets requirement is reduced to £500,000); (ii) a partnership or unincorporated association with net assets of at least £5 million and (iii) a trustee of a trust which has had gross assets (i.e. total assets held before deduction of any liabilities) of at least £10 million at any time within the year preceding the promotion. Any financial promotion information is available only to such persons, and persons of any other description in the UK may not rely on the information in it. Most of the protections provided by the UK regulatory system, and compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, will not be available.

© SEBA / Grafenauweg 6, 6300 Zug, Switzerland

Research

more
Research report
Bitcoin, gold, and coronavirus
03 April, 2020
Does bitcoin as outside money stand a chance to weather the coronavirus storm? In this article, we present the empirical analyses of various crises and bitcoin bottoms.
Read more
Research report
Bitcoin is dead, long live Bitcoin
22 March, 2020
In this special edition of the Digital Investor, we present our take on the recent crash in financial markets. As the Coronavirus took the entire world by storm, financial markets across the board started tumbling in synchronisation. Amidst this crash, all the correlation theories seemed to be breaking down. Does this mean that digital assets will forever be correlated with broader markets? What happens in this new regime of zero interest rates? We think that in such an environment, cryptocurrencies, as outside money, can prove to be a much needed diversifier.
Read more
Research report
Forks: A double-edged sword
19 March, 2020
The Bridge is a publication designed to explain the key concepts behind blockchain and crypto-currencies. If you are unfamiliar with forks, this article is made for you. A fork is the action uses to change the rules that govern a blockchain ecosystem. What are the different types of forks? How do they impact different stakeholders in a blockchain ecosystem? We explain all of this in the March edition of the bridge.
Read more

Join us as we redefine finance.

Contact us
seba

SEBA Bank AG
Kolinplatz 15
6300 Zug
Switzerland

ServicesCompanyNews & InsightsCareersContact
Receive the newest insights, research and news from SEBA directly to your inbox
Newsletter subscription
© 2020 SEBA Bank AG