Sign up for our newsletter
Receive insights on the current developments at SEBA and stay ahead of the curve with our well-founded in house research papers.
First name
Last name
Email address
Continue
Executive SummaryIntroductionBitcoinOther Payment ChainsEthereumOther Platform ChainsDecentralised FinanceConclusion
Thursday, 7 October, 2021
The Digital Investor

Scaling New Heights

Executive Summary

September was a tumultuous month as good and bad news alternated. In the same month, bitcoin became legal tender in one country while another country banned all trading activities. In our view, bitcoin has shown enough resilience and maturity that adverse regulation, even from a large country like China, is more a speed bump than a death knell. On the positive side, Lightning Network is becoming the killer solution for micropayments as it was integrated for tipping on Twitter and adopted by millions of Salvadorans.

Ethereum now has almost 50% lower inflation because of the changes in tokenomics from EIP-1559 without any impact on security. While it has lost market share to competitors, it is trying to compete through scaling solutions that are in public betas but will fully roll out before the end of the year.

Polkadot will be getting parachain auctions in Q4 and should see significant interest, as the ones on Kusama have been very successful. Smart contracts launched on Cardano but ran into roadblocks because of the choices made in chain architecture.

Decentralised finance has been an underperformer over the past year. To capture a larger number of users, DeFi protocols are now diversified among different chains and scaling solutions. Integrations with NFTs and permissioned pools will be the next engines for growth for DeFi.

In the last nine years, Q4 has been a strong quarter for crypto assets. If history rhymes, the positive price action of the first days of the final quarter should set the tone for the months to come.

Table 1: Price performance in USD of the assets in coverage universe as of 30 September 2021

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

Introduction

September was a tumultuous month as all digital assets closed in the red. Unsurprisingly, Bitcoin outperformed in a down market, losing only 7%. The markets started the month strong in anticipation of El Salvador adopting bitcoin as legal tender on 7 September, nicknamed "Bitcoin Day". Bitcoin price increased above USD 50,000 on the day before crashing by 11% as traders “sold the news”. This is not the first time crypto overheats in the lead up to a positive event. One of the most prominent cases of this phenomenon was in the lead up to the Coinbase listing on 14 April, when bitcoin reached its all-time high at USD ~63,000, just the day before. The following days saw very high liquidations, and in the subsequent months, the bitcoin price declined by more than 50%, falling below USD 30,000 in July. It has recovered to USD 50,000 at the time of writing. We covered this phenomenon in our Crypto Market Monitor, “Sell the NewsSell the Newslink1”.

Figure 1: Open interest peaks in anticipation of good news; however, leads to high liquidations after the event

Source: SEBA Bank, Skew Analytics, Coinmetrics

Bitcoin

In September, China extended the crypto ban to all digital asset trading activities. Since then, Huobi, an exchange focussing on China, has stopped opening new accounts from the region and will be closing accountsclosing accountslink1 of all Mainland China users by 31 December 2021.

In our opinion, this setback should not have long term negative consequences. Bitcoin and other crypto assets are now global enough and well established in multiple friendly jurisdictions to digest such a setback, even from a big country like China. In our Digital RegulatorDigital Regulatorlink1, our publication monitoring global regulatory developments, we observe a clear trend towards regulating the rise of this new asset class, not banning it. Switzerland granted two banking licences to crypto banks, in the US where the crypto legal framework is unclear, Coinbase is listed on Nasdaq. Canada and several EU countries have ETP/ETF products of digital assets. The European Union is working on regulating the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) and will implement a framework in two to three years.

Whenever a government bans crypto, another capitalises on it. This is evident from how Bitcoin recovered after the Chinese mining ban. The miners have moved to friendlier jurisdictions, and hash rate and network difficulty have significantly recovered from the lows in July 2021. El Salvador also recently announcedannouncedlink1 that it has started using clean geothermal energy to mine bitcoin as well.

Figure 2: Hash rate and network difficulty have recovered 50% from the bottom in July 2021

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

September was not all negative news. “Bitcoin Day” was historic as bitcoin became legal tender in El Salvador. Individuals in El Salvador shared pictures of them buying foodfoodlink1 or coffeecoffeelink1 at multi-national chains using bitcoin. The Salvadoran president, Nayib Bukele, announcedannouncedlink1 that 2.1 million people were actively using the Chivo wallet. Last month also, Twitter integrated Lightning Network for users to tip each other. This is a significant development as it may encourage other large tech companies to incorporate crypto. Earlier, companies like Microsoft XboxMicrosoft Xboxlink1 and SteamSteamlink1 integrated Bitcoin as a payment solution, and recently Amazon published a job openingjob openinglink1 for a “Digital Currency and Blockchain Product Lead".

For small day-to-day transaction sizes, bitcoin’s layer-2 scaling solution, Lightning Network, is preferred. As a result of integration in El Salvador and Twitter tips, Lightning Network use is growing along with capacity. Scaling solutions like the Lightning Network are crucial for crypto assets to absorb global adoption. We will cover different scaling solutions in more detail in the upcoming publication of The Bridge.

Figure 3: Sharp increase in the number of open channels and bitcoin capacity on the Lightning Network

Source: SEBA Bank, Bitcoin Visuals

Other Payment Chains

Litecoin had an exciting month as well. Fake newsFake newslink1 broke out that Walmart entered a partnership with the coin and will allow LTC payments across its online and offline stores starting 1 October 2021. This news spread quickly, with major news outlets like Reuters and CNBC publishing it. However, Globe News Wire, the publisher of the news, was duped by a person using a “walmart-corp.com” email address that is owned by a domain squatter.

Revisiting the network value to transactions ratio or NVT ratio, we see a sharp improvement in the multiple for the payment chains Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Stellar, with the NVT ratio reducing further than the fall in price. For Ethereum, the NVT was unchanged if you exclude the price impact.

Figure 4: NVT ratios of coins were lower in September compared to August

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

Market capitalisation to realised value ratio or MVRV ratio is a more behavioural indicator, unlike the NVT, which is a more fundamental indicator. MVRV measures the degree to which holders are in profit, with holders more likely to sell at higher levels because of the disposition effectdisposition effectlink1 found in behavioural finance, where investors are more likely to sell their winners and hold on to their losers. On an absolute basis, LTC is the cheapest, with an MVRV ratio of just 1.1, followed by ETH at 1.7. Both BTC and XLM have an MVRV ratio of 2.1.

Figure 5: MVRV ratios of all coins have fallen during September

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

Ethereum

In August, Ethereum implemented its last significant upgrade, EIP-1559, which changed its tokenomics. With almost two months since the update, we can measure the impact it has had on net inflation. Before EIP-1559, approximately 14,000 ETH were issued daily. Since 5 August, the average daily issuance has dropped to ~7,500 ETH. Despite the reduction of ETH issuance, the security budget of Ethereum has barely changed as miner revenues fell by a mere 5% since the implementation of EIP-1559 compared to July 2021. This means that Ethereum is as secure as ever, and there is no reason for miners to be dissatisfied.

Figure 6: Ethereum’s net inflation has halved while miner revenues are not significantly affected

Source: SEBA Bank, Etherscan, Coinmetrics

Inflation on Ethereum has an inverse relationship with the gas fee, with higher gas fees causing more burn and lower inflation. However, the high gas fee has also increased transaction costs making the blockchain more expensive to use. Let us take a moment to understand why gas prices are so high on Ethereum. Even as the gas fee is high, usage of the blockchain indicates that users continue to believe the benefit they derive from the transaction is greater than the transaction cost. Ethereum is the first and largest smart contract platform and has a culture of smart contract innovation. As new use cases for smart contracts are developed, they come first on Ethereum. This was seen in 2017 with ICOs, 2020 with DeFi and again this year with NFTs. As a new use case develops, early investors see huge returns on their capital. This brings new investors and new projects as it creates excitement around the new theme. Since investors expect a high return on capital, they are willing to pay a high transaction fee as the cost of doing business. However, since gas prices are the same across transaction sizes, slowly smaller investors get priced out. Other chains then give these users a cheaper way to invest by replicating the hot trend on their platforms.

In 2021, competing platforms have gained traction as they have become more sophisticated, capturing an increasing share of users and developers through cheap fees and large incentive programs. As a result, Ethereum TVL (total value locked) market share has declined throughout the year, from 99% in early January to 77% in September. While scaling solutions like Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism provide a way for Ethereum to scale, their adoption is still at a fraction of other platforms. Arbitrum and Optimism are both in beta and do not yet have an incentives program, their market share should improve as they have a full release.

Figure 7: Ethereum is slowly losing market share to competing platforms

Source: SEBA Bank, Defi Llama

Other Platform Chains

Polkadot and Cardano, two competing platforms to Ethereum, are still at an early stage. Polkadot does not yet have smart contracts, and while Cardano does support them, there are no significant implementations yet.

For Polkadot, as usual, we look to its canary network, Kusama. Nine parachain auctions have successfully concluded on Kusama, with two more to finish in October. In the nine parachain auctions so far, 2 million KSM or USD 600 million have been locked, constituting almost 20% of the market cap. Extrapolated to Polkadot, that would mean USD 6 billion or 200 million DOT will be locked in nine parachain auctions. Polkadot parachain auctions are expected to start in Q4 2021 and are one of the key expected events of this quarter.

For Cardano, the Alonzo upgrade went live, bringing much-awaited smart contracts to the blockchain. However, issues at launch, along with the lack of developer tooling, underwhelmed the market. Currently, only prototypical smart contracts written by IOHK developers have been released, and Cardano would need a few more months to replicate the applications already present on Ethereum and other platform chains. At the annual Cardano Summit, IOHK announced significant partnerships. Cardano will be providing a digital identity solution for Dish Network's customers, and ChainLink will be providing oracle services to the Cardano ecosystem.

For proof-of-stake chains, stakers provide the vital service of securing the network instead of miners. Stakers lock their funds in the protocol and earn a yield as compensation. We compare Cardano, Polkadot and Ethereum 2.0 staking on four metrics in Table 2. The absolute value staked shows how much value is securing the network; Cardano has the highest and is, therefore, the most secure. For the percentage of market cap staked, since ADA and DOT do not have productive use of the token, the percentage of market cap locked is much higher than that of Ethereum. A higher yield means that stakers want higher compensation for locking their funds; Polkadot stakers earn the highest yield. The number of validators represents how decentralised the security is; however, this is inflated for Ethereum as it has a cap of 32 ETH per validator. Among the other two, Cardano leads with 7x the number of validators of Polkadot.

Table 2: Staking statistics of Ethereum, Cardano and Polkadot

Source: SEBA Bank, Polkadot, Staking Rewards, Stakers.info

Cardano recorded a significant increase in on-chain activity. Average active addresses increased by 51% to 151,000, and the average number of transactions increased by 85% to 89,000. On the other hand, Polkadot saw a steady increase, with average active addresses rising by 12% to 30,000 and average transaction count increasing by 28% to 183,000.

Figure 8: Cardano and Polkadot saw increased activity on the platforms in September

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

Decentralised Finance

Decentralised finance (DeFi) on Ethereum has suffered for multiple reasons. Gas prices are elevated, non-fungible tokens have become the dominant theme, and as we covered in the latest Digital RegulatorDigital Regulatorlink1, there is a regulatory overhang. Consequently, user growth has slowed to only 18% growth in Q3 2021 compared to 65% in Q2 2021. DeFi on Ethereum added only 535,00 new users in Q3 2021, with a total user base of 3.4 million.

Figure 9: DeFi user growth on Ethereum has sharply fallen

Source: SEBA Bank, Dune Analytics

While the data above captures only users on Ethereum, all DeFi protocols under coverage have diversified to Ethereum scaling solutions or alternate platforms. Uniswap and Synthetix have beta products on Optimism and Arbitrum, Aave is on Polygon and Avalanche, Yearn Finance has experimental vaults on Arbitrum, Polygon, Binance Smart Chain and Fantom, and ChainLink is going to be platform agnostic with services already on Polygon, Binance Smart Chain and Arbitrum and plans to expand to other chains as well. The strategy of going horizontal across platforms makes a lot of sense for these products as it allows them to diversify and capitalise on the success of any chain. As users move to other platforms, they are likely to already associate with these brands, giving them an edge over newer players.

Table 3: DeFi products are following the users and going multi-platform

Source: SEBA Bank, Project websites

Despite the slowdown, the DeFi space is not dormant. Uniswap rolled out an updaterolled out an updatelink1 to its trade routing algorithm. Orders can now route through multiple liquidity pools to reduce slippage. This improvement is especially relevant for larger trades, where interacting with only one pool would cause a higher amount of slippage.

Aave is looking towards NFTs and institutional pools as its next growth engines. Founder, Stani Kulechov, announced that Aave is looking to integrate NFTs as collateralNFTs as collaterallink1 and build a social mediasocial medialink1 platform connecting DeFi and NFTs. This is a win-win for Aave and NFTs as it makes NFTs productive assets by allowing holders to lend or borrow against them while Aave unlocks a new asset class. An Aave governance voteAave governance votelink1 on institutional pools is proposed to make Fireblocks a whitelister for the institutions, which suggests that Aave Arc is around the corner.

Conclusion

September was a tumultuous month as good and bad news alternated. October has started on the right foot. We remain constructive in Q4 as adoption continues, and new developments are likely to create new opportunities. Scalability solutions are implemented, providing faster and cheaper transactions to end-users. In this context, the Lightning Network is an excellent example of how transformative scalability solutions are. Without it, El Salvador and Twitter would not be able to make bitcoin a unit for micropayments.

The rise of Ethereum alternative smart contract platforms, with their specificities and advantages, provide niches on which decentralised applications will grow. In addition, the integration of DeFi and NFT are likely to be beneficial for both these sectors. Finally, the creation of whitelisted DeFi platforms a la AAVE Arc potentially opens the door to financial institutions.

While past performance is not indicative of future results, it appears there is cyclicality in crypto asset price performance. Historically, the Bitcoin price performance is strong in Q4. On average, its price doubled (+105%) in the last nine years. If history repeats, Bitcoin price may finish the year at an all-time high to around USD 90,000.

Table 4: Quarterly returns of BTC in USD

Source: SEBA Bank, Coinmetrics

0
Download pdf
Share:
Subscribe to the research newsletter and get weekly updates about the latest articles of SEBAresearch
Subscribe to newsletter

Authors


Yves Longchamp
Head of Research SEBA Bank AG
in
Kunal Goel
Research Analyst B&B
Analytics Private Limited
in
Aishwary Gupta
Research Analyst
B&B Analytics Private Limited
in
research@seba.swiss | Disclaimer

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is published solely for information purposes; it is not an advertisement nor is it a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning SEBA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the financial investments, markets or developments referred to in the document. SEBA does not undertake to update or keep current the information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent SEBA's interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any prices stated in this document are for information purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been effected at those prices, and any prices do not necessarily reflect SEBA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by SEBA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications. SEBA and any of its directors or employees may be entitled at any time to hold long or short positions in investments, carry out transactions involving relevant investments in the capacity of principal or agent, or provide any other services or have officers, who serve as directors, either to/for the issuer, the investment itself or to/for any company commercially or financially affiliated to such investment.

At any time, investment decisions (including whether to buy, sell or hold investments) made by SEBA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in SEBA research publications.

Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. Investing in digital assets including cryptocurrencies as well as in futures and options is not suitable for every investor as there is a substantial risk of loss, and losses in excess of an initial investment may under certain circumstances occur. The value of any investment or income may go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Additional information will be made available upon request. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.

SEBA does not provide legal or tax advice and makes no representations as to the tax treatment of assets or the investment returns thereon both in general or with reference to specific investor’s circumstances and needs. We are of necessity unable to take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of individual investors and we would recommend that you take financial and/or tax advice as to the implications (including tax) prior to investing. Neither SEBA nor any of its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss (including investment loss) or damage arising out of the use of all or any of the Information provided in the document.

This document may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of SEBA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing SEBA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. SEBA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of SEBA. The information contained in this document is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. SEBA may use research input provided by analysts employed by its affiliate B&B Analytics Private Limited, Mumbai. The analyst(s) responsible for the preparation of this document may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other parties for the purpose of gathering, applying and interpreting market information The compensation of the analyst who prepared this document is determined exclusively by SEBA.

Austria: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Austria nor is SEBA supervised by the Austrian Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. France: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in France nor is SEBA supervised by French banking and financial authorities. Italy: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Italy nor is SEBA supervised by the Bank of Italy (Banca d’Italia) and the Italian Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (CONSOB - Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Germany: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Germany nor is SEBA supervised by the German Federal Financial Services Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Hong-Kong: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Hong-Kong nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Hong-Kong, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Hong-Kong where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder (the “SFO”). Netherlands: This publication has been produced by SEBA, which is not authorised to provide regulated services in the Netherlands. Portugal: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Portugal nor is SEBA supervised by the Portuguese regulators Bank of Portugal “Banco de Portugal” and Portuguese Securities Exchange Commission “Comissao do Mercado de Valores Mobiliarios”. Singapore: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in SIngapore nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Singapore, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document was provided to you as a result of a request received by SEBA from you and/or persons entitled to make the request on your behalf. Should you have received the document erroneously, SEBA asks that you kindly destroy/delete it and inform SEBA immediately. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Singapore where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not accredited investors, expert investors or institutional investors as defined in section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289 of Singapore) (“SFA”). UK: This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.

SEBA is not an authorised person for purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), and accordingly, any information if deemed a financial promotion is provided only to persons in the UK reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom promotions may be communicated by an unauthorised person pursuant to an exemption under the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments (“Investment Professionals”) and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO (“High Net Worth Businesses”). High Net Worth Businesses include: (i) a corporation which has called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million or is a member of a group in which includes a company with called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million (but where the corporation has more than 20 shareholders or it is a subsidiary of a company with more than 20 shareholders, the £5 million share capital / net assets requirement is reduced to £500,000); (ii) a partnership or unincorporated association with net assets of at least £5 million and (iii) a trustee of a trust which has had gross assets (i.e. total assets held before deduction of any liabilities) of at least £10 million at any time within the year preceding the promotion. Any financial promotion information is available only to such persons, and persons of any other description in the UK may not rely on the information in it. Most of the protections provided by the UK regulatory system, and compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, will not be available.

© SEBA / Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug, Switzerland

Research

more
China bans; the US doesn’t: Crypto wins
Global superpowers, China and the US, debate cryptocurrencies and take opposing positions, making international headlines. Considering the broader context, cryptocurrencies win.
Read more
Tokenomics
Tokenomics describes the role a cryptocurrency plays in a blockchain ecosystem. Understanding the key components of tokenomics is essential in assessing the potential of a project.
Read more
The DeFi Regulatory Challenge
Decentralised Finance (DeFi) generates benefits and is growing in importance. A regulatory endorsement is crucial for mass adoption. This might be achieved through the constructive cooperation between...
Read more

Join us as we

redefine finance.

Contact us
SEBA logo

SEBA Bank AG
Kolinplatz 15
6300 Zug
Switzerland

CompanyResearchCareersContact
Receive the newest insights, research and news from SEBA Bank directly to your inbox
Newsletter subscription
© 2021 SEBA Bank AG