Sign up for our newsletter
Receive insights on the current developments at SEBA and stay ahead of the curve with our well-founded in house research papers.
First name
Last name
Email address
Continue
Necessity of further developing the FATF’s draft on the update to the Guidance for a risk-based approach to VAs and VASPsOther Noteworthy DevelopmentsConclusion
Wednesday, 12 May, 2021
The Digital Regulator

FATF and DeFi: Further thinking is required

Abstract

On 19 March 2021, the FATF issued an updateupdatelink1 to its 2019 Guidance on the risk-based approach to virtual assets (VAs) and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) for consultation. The consultation was concluded on 20 April 2021, and the FATF will report its way forward in June 2021. Among other aspects, the proposed updates broaden the definition of VA and extend the definition of VASP with the goal to ensure that all digital financial assets are captured by FATF standards. The FATF is attempting to extend an approach that is constructed around the notion of centralised intermediaries (e.g. banks and exchanges) and the possibility of expert judgment (e.g. assess the suspicious nature of transactions) on highly automated, per definition decentralised, DeFi protocols. If the update is not modified to account for the specificities of DeFi, the final Guidance may cause the overregulation of the digital financial industry and disincentivise financial innovation.

In the previous few weeks, the digital space has been witnessing several noteworthy regulatory developments. Several jurisdictions made or anticipated significant progress in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) based on their fear that private stablecoins might weaken monetary sovereignty unless they offered the public a valid alternative. The significant trading gains associated with the development of cryptocurrency prices are driving many countries to issue dedicated taxes on trading gains. Turkey is implementing regulatory actions following the collapse of the Thodex and Vebitcoin exchanges. The US Congress has initiated decisive steps to clarify the regulatory framework for the US cryptocurrency market. Further, the European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its public consultation on the launch of a digital euro and indicated privacy and security as the main concerns. Finally, due to the actions taken by the Canadian regulator, North America enters the cryptocurrency exchange-traded fund (ETF) space.

Necessity of further developing the FATF’s draft on the update to the Guidance for a risk-based approach to VAs and VASPs

As mandated by the G20 in the aftermath of the early 2018 bitcoin and initial coin offering boom, the FATF elaborated on and adopted changes to its internationally endorsed global standards against money laundering (anti-money laundering, AML) and terrorism financing (combating the financing of terrorism, CFT) in October 2018 to explicitly clarify their application to financial activities involving VAs. Subsequently, in June 2019, the FATF further clarified the standards’ application to VAs and VASPs and published the Guidance on the risk-based approach to VAs and VASPs. On 19 March 2021, the FATF issued its proposed updates to this Guidance for public consultation. The updates address, among other things, the application of the global standards to peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions, including DeFi and stablecoins.

  • Scope of the proposed updates—The proposed revisions focus on six key areas. The first is concerned with the clarification of the definitions of VA and VASP. The clarification aims to include all relevant digital financial assets that are not covered by the standards yet (level playing field). The second area covers the standards’ application to stablecoins, whereas the third provides additional guidance on the risks and potential risk mitigants of P2P transactions, including DeFi. Updates to the guidance regarding VASP licensing and registration come under the fourth area. The fifth area is associated with further improving and clarifying the implementation of the ‘travel rule’ by private and public actors. Finally, the sixth area addresses the issues of information sharing and cooperation among supervisors. In addition, the updates clarify that CBDCs are not considered to be VAs.
  • Problem with the widespread use of P2P protocols—The revised guidance highlights P2P transactions and recognises that such transactions are not currently explicitly subject to the FATF global standards since these are constructed around the notion and existence of a (centralised) financial intermediary (VASP), rather than on the transacting individuals themselves. The widespread use of disintermediated transactions, including cases when P2P transfers occur automatically through smart contracts under the governance of a DeFi protocol, will jeopardise the effectiveness of AML and CFT controls. DeFi emerged during 2020 and, since then, has managed to attract an exponential increase in funds, with the latest figures indicating that over USD 85 billion are locked in DeFi smart contracts1. DeFi effectively decentralises and automatises as many traditional financial services as possible, including payments, lending, trading, and exchanges, through smart contracts that carry out P2P transactions in a deterministic manner without involving (centralised) financial intermediaries and leaving no space for discretionary judgment.
  • Expansion of VA and VASP definitions as a solution—The revised guidance makes it clear that the definition of VA should be technologically neutral and focus on the asset’s digital nature and payment or investment purpose. Further, a functional approach should drive the definition of VASP, which should encompass transactions, or businesses, among natural and legal persons, such as exchanges between VA and fiat currencies, exchanges between one or more VA forms, VA transfers, VA safekeeping and/or administration, and participation in and provision of VA-related financial services. The FATF indicates that decentralised or distributed applications (DApps) that typically underlie P2P transactions, including DeFi protocols, are not VASPs. However, it also indicates that some entities involved in DApps may be VASPs. Being a VASP, in turn, requires conducting Know-Your-Customer, AML, and CFT checks on the individual controlling the VA, performing sanctions screening, assessing and reporting on the suspicious nature of transactions, and applying the travel rule to the transactions.
  • Unintended consequences—As currently specified, the revised guidance will certainly define as VASPs several parties involved in DApps, such as the owners, controllers, operators, and developers of DeFi. These individuals would not be deemed VASPs in the context of centralised financial intermediaries. These decentralised parties will be required to implement the compliance requirements mentioned in the previous paragraph, meaningfully coordinate the implementation of these requirements, and overcome major challenges, such as introducing the possibility of judgmentally assessing the potentially suspicious nature of each automatically and deterministically transacted VA. The proposed revision, as currently defined, will promote the centralisation of DeFi or heavily discourage DeFi and disincentivise the associated financial innovation, which is considered a positive development based on the huge interest generated by DeFi, including from the traditional finance world.

The FATF intends to ensure sustainable finance by controlling and limiting the illicit use of financial instruments and processes to launder money and finance terrorist activities. All parties involved undisputedly support this intention and goal. However, as discussed earlier, the revisions to the Guidance for a risk-based approach to VAs and VASPs currently proposed by the FATF do not achieve the goal. If the current proposition is implemented as it is, the revised requirements will severely disincentivise the broad distributed ledger technology (DLT)-based financial innovation that comes under the umbrella term of DeFi, which is supported by both DLT-based and traditional finance. Further, if they are signed off as such in June 2021, the revisions proposed by the FATF will have to be implemented at the national level by national supervisors, who will be required to specify the operational side of its implementation. Accordingly, the national supervisors will have to assume the responsibility of maintaining an adequate balance between the safeguarding of positive DLT-based financial innovation (bringing about efficiency and inclusiveness in finance) and the potential of these financial applications to be misused for money laundering and terrorism financing purposes.

Other Noteworthy Developments

Several jurisdictions are making or anticipating significant progress in the area of CBDCs. The common denominator among them seems to be the concern that private stablecoins may weaken monetary sovereignty if the jurisdictions fail to offer a valid alternative to the public.

  • Japan has decided to accelerate accelerate link1its CBDC testing program and will beginbeginlink1 experimenting the CBDC program later this year. It has not yet announced any plan to issue its CBDC but intends to expedite preparations in case of a future need to issue the CBDC. To facilitate the process, the Bank of Japan created a ‘liaison and coordination committeeliaison and coordination committeelink1’ to coordinate the actions of the central bank and private sector.
  • China has initiated effortsinitiated effortslink1 to grant international interoperability to CBDCs. According to the People’s Bank of China, there should be a set of rules that are globally applicable to CBDCs to provide guidance on sensitive issues such as information-sharing and monitoring activities. Domestically, China has extendedextendedlink1 its CBDC testing program to include a Shenzhen population comprising 500,000 citizens, who have been asked to open a digital yuan wallet account.
  • Russia announcedannouncedlink1 the issuance of a CBDC prototype in autumn, and it will start pilotingpilotinglink1 its CBDC in 2022. The country’s intention is to gain market dominance and limit the use of stablecoins in settlements upfront.
  • Thailand will start testingtestinglink1 its retail CBDC in 2022. The central bank fears that the success of private stablecoins may threaten its monetary sovereignty.
  • The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank has launchedlaunchedlink1 its CBDC, called DCash. The DCash is a digital version of the Eastern Caribbean dollar, which is the official currency of the eight countries making up the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union.
  • In the United Kingdom, the Bank of England and His Majesty’s Treasury teamed up to launchlaunchlink1 a CBDC task force. The task force is responsible for coordinating the objectives, use cases, opportunities, and risks of a potential UK CBDC.

The significant trading gains associated with the price of cryptocurrencies are encouraging many countries to issue dedicated tax on trading gains.

  • Indonesia is considering considering link1levying a tax on all cryptocurrency transactions occurring on regulated exchanges. Further, Norway’s tax authority remindsremindslink1 taxpayers to declare their 2020 gains, on which a 22% tax rate is applicable. Finally, in Spain, the tax agency has summoned summoned link1crypto holders to declare their 2020 holdings.

Turkey is implementing regulatory actions following the collapse of the Thodex and Vebitcoin exchanges.

  • In Turkey, two local exchanges—Thodex and Vebitcoin—collapsed in the space of a few days and caused the Central Bank to accelerateacceleratelink1 the substantial policy response for already initiated digital currencies and consider the creationcreationlink1 of a new custodial bank for the crypto funds of domestic crypto exchanges.

Eventually, the US Congress initiated decisive steps to clarify the regulatory framework of the US cryptocurrency market.

  • The US Congress House of Representatives passed a bill bill link1to clarify the roles of agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the policing of cryptocurrencies in the country. Further, the bill addresses the ongoing debate on whether crypto tokens are securities or commodities. The Congress has 90 days to establish a working group involving the aforementioned regulatory agencies and the private sector, and the group is required to issue a report analysing the situation and making proposals within a year’s time.

The ECB published the results of its public consultation on the launch of a digital euro.

  • The ECB published published link1the results of its public consultation on a digital euro that was launched some time ago. Most of the respondents indicated privacy and security as the main concerns associated with a potential digital euro and, thereby, established various priorities.

Due to the efforts of the Canadian regulator, North America entered the cryptocurrency ETF space.

  • In early 2021, Canada became the first North American country to introduce a bitcoin ETF. More recently, Canada’s securities regulator approved approved link1the world’s first Ethereum ETF. In contrast, the US Securities Exchange Commission has delayeddelayedlink1 making any decision on the VanEck Bitcoin ETF proposal for a 45-day period.

Conclusion

The transformation of traditional financial products, services, and processes is ongoing, and the development of DLT-based finance is an important part of it. Over the past 20 months, we witnessed the emergence of numerous DeFi protocols, which significantly enhanced efficiency and inclusiveness in finance. The interest is considerable. Currently, over USD 85 billion is locked in DeFi, and both traditional and DLT-based financial professionals are supporting DeFi. Appropriate regulation should marginalise illicit use cases, promote sustainable solutions, and address new innovations. To address these challenges, the FATF has proposed updating its Guidance for a risk-based approach to VAs and VASPs. Regrettably, the proposed amendments extend an approach that is based on the centralised intermediaries and on the possibility of operating human judgement (e.g. assess the suspicious nature of transactions) on highly automated DeFi protocols. If national supervisors, who will likely be assigned the responsibility of implementing the proposed updates as such, fail to balance the safeguarding of positive DLT-based financial innovation and the limitation of these financial applications to be misused for money laundering and terrorism financing, an overregulation of the digital financial industry and disincentivising of positive financial innovation may occur.


1 Source: https://defipulse.com/
Download pdf
Share:
Subscribe to the research newsletter and get weekly updates about the latest articles of SEBAresearch
Subscribe to newsletter

Authors


Mattia Rattaggi
External Regulatory Analyst METI Advisory AG
in
Yves Longchamp
Head of Research SEBA Bank AG
in
research@seba.swiss | Disclaimer

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is published solely for information purposes; it is not an advertisement nor is it a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning SEBA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the financial investments, markets or developments referred to in the document. SEBA does not undertake to update or keep current the information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent SEBA's interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any prices stated in this document are for information purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been effected at those prices, and any prices do not necessarily reflect SEBA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by SEBA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications. SEBA and any of its directors or employees may be entitled at any time to hold long or short positions in investments, carry out transactions involving relevant investments in the capacity of principal or agent, or provide any other services or have officers, who serve as directors, either to/for the issuer, the investment itself or to/for any company commercially or financially affiliated to such investment.

At any time, investment decisions (including whether to buy, sell or hold investments) made by SEBA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in SEBA research publications.

Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. Investing in digital assets including cryptocurrencies as well as in futures and options is not suitable for every investor as there is a substantial risk of loss, and losses in excess of an initial investment may under certain circumstances occur. The value of any investment or income may go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Additional information will be made available upon request. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.

SEBA does not provide legal or tax advice and makes no representations as to the tax treatment of assets or the investment returns thereon both in general or with reference to specific investor’s circumstances and needs. We are of necessity unable to take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of individual investors and we would recommend that you take financial and/or tax advice as to the implications (including tax) prior to investing. Neither SEBA nor any of its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss (including investment loss) or damage arising out of the use of all or any of the Information provided in the document.

This document may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of SEBA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing SEBA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. SEBA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of SEBA. The information contained in this document is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. SEBA may use research input provided by analysts employed by its affiliate B&B Analytics Private Limited, Mumbai. The analyst(s) responsible for the preparation of this document may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other parties for the purpose of gathering, applying and interpreting market information The compensation of the analyst who prepared this document is determined exclusively by SEBA.

Austria: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Austria nor is SEBA supervised by the Austrian Financial Market Authority (Finanzmarktaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. France: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in France nor is SEBA supervised by French banking and financial authorities. Italy: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Italy nor is SEBA supervised by the Bank of Italy (Banca d’Italia) and the Italian Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (CONSOB - Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Germany: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Germany nor is SEBA supervised by the German Federal Financial Services Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht), to which this document has not been submitted for approval. Hong-Kong: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Hong-Kong nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Hong-Kong, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Hong-Kong where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder (the “SFO”). Netherlands: This publication has been produced by SEBA, which is not authorised to provide regulated services in the Netherlands. Portugal: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in Portugal nor is SEBA supervised by the Portuguese regulators Bank of Portugal “Banco de Portugal” and Portuguese Securities Exchange Commission “Comissao do Mercado de Valores Mobiliarios”. Singapore: SEBA is not licensed to conduct banking and financial activities in SIngapore nor is SEBA supervised by banking and financial authorities in Singapore, to which this document has not been submitted for approval. This document was provided to you as a result of a request received by SEBA from you and/or persons entitled to make the request on your behalf. Should you have received the document erroneously, SEBA asks that you kindly destroy/delete it and inform SEBA immediately. This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in Singapore where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject SEBA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This document is under no circumstances directed to, or intended for distribution, publication to or use by, persons who are not accredited investors, expert investors or institutional investors as defined in section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289 of Singapore) (“SFA”). UK: This document has been prepared by SEBA Bank AG (“SEBA”) in Switzerland. SEBA is a Swiss bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). This document is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.

SEBA is not an authorised person for purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), and accordingly, any information if deemed a financial promotion is provided only to persons in the UK reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom promotions may be communicated by an unauthorised person pursuant to an exemption under the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments (“Investment Professionals”) and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO (“High Net Worth Businesses”). High Net Worth Businesses include: (i) a corporation which has called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million or is a member of a group in which includes a company with called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million (but where the corporation has more than 20 shareholders or it is a subsidiary of a company with more than 20 shareholders, the £5 million share capital / net assets requirement is reduced to £500,000); (ii) a partnership or unincorporated association with net assets of at least £5 million and (iii) a trustee of a trust which has had gross assets (i.e. total assets held before deduction of any liabilities) of at least £10 million at any time within the year preceding the promotion. Any financial promotion information is available only to such persons, and persons of any other description in the UK may not rely on the information in it. Most of the protections provided by the UK regulatory system, and compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, will not be available.

© SEBA / Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug, Switzerland

Research

more
Cryptocurrency Markets and Regulators - What to expect
The US regulators are contemplating action in the wake of recent market developments. A regulatory upgrade is required to promote institutional-grade cryptofinance.
Read more
Yearn Finance – Decentralised Asset Management
In this edition of Digital Investor, we cover the largest decentralised asset management protocol, Yearn Finance. We cover its fair launch, the value drivers for the token, its moat and significant pr...
Read more
NFT: A New Fancy Technology
We uncover the latest trend in the cryptoverse, Non-Fungible Tokens or NFTs. NFTs are often mistaken to be digital art, however, they are not the art or asset itself but the deed or proof-of-ownership...
Read more

Join us as we

redefine finance.

Contact us
SEBA logo

SEBA Bank AG
Kolinplatz 15
6300 Zug
Switzerland

CompanyResearchCareersContact
Receive the newest insights, research and news from SEBA Bank directly to your inbox
Newsletter subscription
© 2021 SEBA Bank AG